02-11-2008, 07:50 PM
Autism families' legal fight continues
JIM WILKES/TORONTO STAR
Lynn Shane plays with her “bright little fella,” Adam, 8, who was taken out of school because he also needs 21 hours a week of therapy.
`Make or break' moment in court challenge to allow therapists into classrooms to sit with autistic kids
Feb 11, 2008 04:30 AM
Jim Wilkes
Staff Reporter, The Toronto Star
Mississauga mother Lynn Shane no longer wants to be forced to choose between her son's education and the vital therapy he needs for autism.
She and her husband are among a handful of families pursuing a class-action lawsuit against Queen's Park and seven school boards in an attempt to secure therapy in the classroom for their children.
The plaintiff families will be in the Ontario Court of Appeal today in what Shane describes as a "make or break" moment in their legal challenge.
The families suffered a setback last March when a Superior Court judge tossed out most of their claims without a trial.
Lawyers for the province and targeted boards are now seeking $85,000 in legal costs from the families, as well as dismissal of the rest of their claims. The families, who have asserted in court filings that they have spent life savings, remortgaged their homes and taken on extra jobs to pay for autism therapy, hope to restore the dismissed parts of their action.
The Shane family pulled 8-year-old Adam out of school after he completed Grade 2 last June.
His mother, 43, said they could no longer try to keep Adam's days free for school while fitting in 21 hours of Intensive Behaviour Intervention sessions each week for his neurological dysfunction. The government pays $40,000 a year toward the therapy.
"They're mutually exclusive, yet he needs them both," Lynn Shane said yesterday at their Mississauga home. "It was confusing for him to be out of school while he was in therapy and he'd miss so many parts of projects in school. It was heartbreaking for all of us."
She said teachers aren't trained on the implications of autism, which can include limited social skills, communication problems and repetitive behaviours.
Shane calls her son "an incredibly bright little fella" who memorized the ages and birthdays of all the adults at his school, something his teacher thought was a nice trait.
"He is very smart, but that's a skill he doesn't need to have," she said.
She and her husband, David, want to have a therapist sit with Adam in the classroom, to help him digest what is being taught.
In the meantime, she is home-schooling Adam while taking him to Burlington for therapy four days a week.
Education ministry spokesperson Patricia McNeil said the education ministry has no policy on allowing therapists into classrooms, saying school boards make that decision.
The Peel District School Board, among the boards named in the suit, forbids any parent or agency from paying for in-class help for students, including autistic therapists, said spokesperson Brian Woodland.
"No matter what the role, the concerns are there, because you have a child on a completely different program from anyone else, but you have a teacher employed to deliver that curriculum," Woodland said.
JIM WILKES/TORONTO STAR
Lynn Shane plays with her “bright little fella,” Adam, 8, who was taken out of school because he also needs 21 hours a week of therapy.
`Make or break' moment in court challenge to allow therapists into classrooms to sit with autistic kids
Feb 11, 2008 04:30 AM
Jim Wilkes
Staff Reporter, The Toronto Star
Mississauga mother Lynn Shane no longer wants to be forced to choose between her son's education and the vital therapy he needs for autism.
She and her husband are among a handful of families pursuing a class-action lawsuit against Queen's Park and seven school boards in an attempt to secure therapy in the classroom for their children.
The plaintiff families will be in the Ontario Court of Appeal today in what Shane describes as a "make or break" moment in their legal challenge.
The families suffered a setback last March when a Superior Court judge tossed out most of their claims without a trial.
Lawyers for the province and targeted boards are now seeking $85,000 in legal costs from the families, as well as dismissal of the rest of their claims. The families, who have asserted in court filings that they have spent life savings, remortgaged their homes and taken on extra jobs to pay for autism therapy, hope to restore the dismissed parts of their action.
The Shane family pulled 8-year-old Adam out of school after he completed Grade 2 last June.
His mother, 43, said they could no longer try to keep Adam's days free for school while fitting in 21 hours of Intensive Behaviour Intervention sessions each week for his neurological dysfunction. The government pays $40,000 a year toward the therapy.
"They're mutually exclusive, yet he needs them both," Lynn Shane said yesterday at their Mississauga home. "It was confusing for him to be out of school while he was in therapy and he'd miss so many parts of projects in school. It was heartbreaking for all of us."
She said teachers aren't trained on the implications of autism, which can include limited social skills, communication problems and repetitive behaviours.
Shane calls her son "an incredibly bright little fella" who memorized the ages and birthdays of all the adults at his school, something his teacher thought was a nice trait.
"He is very smart, but that's a skill he doesn't need to have," she said.
She and her husband, David, want to have a therapist sit with Adam in the classroom, to help him digest what is being taught.
In the meantime, she is home-schooling Adam while taking him to Burlington for therapy four days a week.
Education ministry spokesperson Patricia McNeil said the education ministry has no policy on allowing therapists into classrooms, saying school boards make that decision.
The Peel District School Board, among the boards named in the suit, forbids any parent or agency from paying for in-class help for students, including autistic therapists, said spokesperson Brian Woodland.
"No matter what the role, the concerns are there, because you have a child on a completely different program from anyone else, but you have a teacher employed to deliver that curriculum," Woodland said.