Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: chromosome 16 and autism
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
here is an article from the Toronto Star

Link discovered between genetic flaws and autism

But errors account for only 1 per cent of cases
Jan 10, 2008 04:30 AM
Megan Ogilvie
Health Reporter

Autism researchers have taken a critical step toward understanding the genetic mechanisms that give rise to one of the most common and mysterious developmental disorders in children.

Mistakes in DNA along a segment of chromosome 16 appear to increase a child's risk of developing autism by as much as one hundredfold, say a consortium of Boston-area scientists who honed in on the genetic "hot spot" after performing the largest autism genome scan to date.

The errors – deleted or duplicated pieces of DNA – are relatively rare, and only account for 1 per cent of autism cases worldwide, said study leader Mark Daly, an assistant professor at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.

But the finding, published online yesterday in the New England Journal of Medicine, will provide answers for the families of that 1 per cent of children. A diagnostic test that can find out whether a child has the genetic errors on chromosome 16 has already been developed, said Daly.

"Early diagnosis that leads to early intervention, in terms of behavioural interventions and educational interventions, has a decidedly positive impact," he said. "One of the great challenges in clinical practice is that many individuals with developmental delays and early symptoms of autism often go for years without a conclusive diagnosis."

Autism spectrum disorder affects an estimated one in 165 children, and can cause a range of symptoms in children including repetitive behaviours and impaired language development and social interaction.

A Toronto group has made the same discovery on chromosome 16, which will be published online Jan. 17 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.

"To find one region present in 1 per cent of patients is a big leap forward in a complex disorder like autism," said Dr. Stephen Scherer, lead author of the Toronto paper and senior scientist at the Hospital for Sick Children, of the Boston results. "We've known for a long time that dozens of genes are involved. To find a specific region that is very predictive in 1 per cent of cases ... is really, really important."
16 is a good number. It's a lovely shade of blue.
That is why I now call chromosome 16 the super sweet sixteen!
Very interesting, especially since the genetic flaw isn't present in any of their control subjects, those without Autism. This implies that it is only present in a certain percentage of those with Autism, and this will make a big impact on current research.
I object strongly to the word "flaw".
I suppose that "goes without saying" around here, though...
Oh shoot.  I done said it Smile
Well, I simply worded it how it written, is all. Plus, it's a random genetic mutation, I would guess, and therefore exceedingly rare. It's kind of interesting how many had this mutation, considering the chances.

But I digress, it's not that I'm saying autism is a flaw(nothing of the sort); but that it is a flaw in a gene which is present(so far) only in autistics.
I was reading an article about the "red hair" gene and it was called a mutation.  I think that is insulting.  Red hair is beautiful.
Even if it is a mutation, it's still a hair colour. In fact, if you really believe in the science behind genes, the very fact that we have more than just one hair colour is a result of genetic mutation. And mutations aren't neccesarily a bad thing. I believe the predominant theory is Darwin's theory of evolution, survival of the fittest. The gene mutations affect the organism's chances of survival. If the organism is better suited to survival, it will live on to pass on the new gene, and therefore the fittest will survive.

This is all just innocent discussion though, right?
How does red hair make a person survive more?  If humans needed to hide in the forest or tall grass, we would have evolved green hair.
Maybe the gene survived because it affected their appearance, and made them more desirable... Tongue
There was infact a serious theory like that about how blond hair got widespread.
My bolding of text.
more on Chromosome 16

Quote:
GENETIC RESEARCH

Study reveals DNA clue to cause of condition
Jan 18, 2008 04:30 AM
Megan Ogilvie
Health Reporter

In many ways, that Tuesday evening phone call did not change much for the Bond family.

Stewart Bond still goes to work at IBM every day and walks their dog, Misty, around their Stouffville neighbourhood at night. His wife, Lisa, still runs errands, cooks dinner and plans fun outings with their daughter, Rebecca. And their son, Joshua, still has autism.

But now, because of that phone call from researchers at The Hospital for Sick Children, the Bonds know why Joshua, an often-giggling, book-loving, Transformers-obsessed 11-year-old, has the disorder. And that, they say, has changed their life.

"Because there is very little known about the causes of autism, you get that diagnosis, and you ask yourself if it was because of something that you did," says Stewart. "And now we understand that it's not. ... there's no thinking about that at all."

The Bonds are one of only four families in Canada who know their child's autism is due to a genetic error on his 16th chromosome. Joshua, who was diagnosed with autism at 6, is missing a short string of DNA on a specific region of this chromosome, and it's this teeny nick that makes it hard for him to pronounce certain words, to get accustomed to new foods and sometimes to interact with strangers.

The family is one of the first to get this definitive diagnosis because they, along with about 400 other families, have been involved in a long-term study at Sick Kids that is searching for the genetic roots of autism, one of the most common and debilitating developmental disorders in children.

The results of that study, published yesterday in the American Journal of Human Genetics, revealed that genetic mistakes along a segment of chromosome 16 appear to increase a child's risk of developing autism by as much as a hundred-fold.

These errors – deleted or duplicated pieces of DNA, called copy number variation – are relatively rare, accounting for only 1 per cent of autism cases, says Stephen Scherer, lead author of the paper and senior scientist at Sick Kids.

This genetic hot spot was also identified by two other research groups, including the Boston-based Autism Consortium that published results last week.

The errors on chromosome 16 are usually spontaneous genetic mutations not passed down from parents to children. Of the four people in the study with the mutation, only one inherited it from a parent.

The next step, already underway at Sick Kids, is to develop a simple and inexpensive DNA test that can pinpoint duplications or deletions on chromosome 16. Right now, autism is diagnosed by assessing a child's behaviour and social communication skills, an often difficult and labour-intensive process, says Rosanna Weksberg, a clinical geneticist and head of clinical and metabolic genetics at Sick Kids.

A DNA test performed as soon as a child exhibits some symptoms could catch autism quickly and early, she says. Studies have shown early intervention, especially when an infant's brain is still developing, can diminish some symptoms.

The promise of genetic tests also raises ethical considerations that researchers are just starting to sort out. For example, how would a potential prenatal DNA test for chromosome 16 mutations be used in family planning?

Wendy Roberts, a developmental pediatrician and co-director of the Autism Research Unit at Sick Kids, says even a DNA test of parents would be valuable for predicting the chances of their next child having autism. If the parents do not test positive for the mutation, the likelihood of a second child testing positive is no higher than in the general population, she says. And she knows there is demand for it; the hospital is already fielding calls from parents who have heard about the mutation and want the test.

"If they thought there would be a test available within a year, most (parents wanting another child) would wait that long," she says.

For other families, just knowing a small DNA blip caused their child's autism will be enough. Though the diagnosis doesn't change, the way they understand it will. "It has a very positive effect on the whole family dynamic," says Weksberg.

The Sick Kids team hopes that as researchers continue to plumb the genome, further markers of autism will appear. They've known for a long time that it's a complex disorder and this is just the first fruit of a long struggle to untangle it.

Last year, Scherer co-authored a study that showed as many as 100 genes could be involved or work in combination to cause autism. Previously, scientists believed only 20 genes caused the disorder.

Lisa Bond knows in the big picture the chromosome 16 mutation is one small piece of a larger mystery. But for her family, she says, it's a big, big piece of the puzzle.

In the week after receiving the news about Joshua, the Bonds have tried to make sense of their new peace – and find the best way to tell Joshua himself.

"We don't want him to think that something was missing, that he has a piece missing," says Lisa. "So we explain things to him in another way."

They have told him that he is extra-special, that he is a hero for helping other kids know why they have autism. "I think he thinks that's pretty cool," she laughs. "And in our eyes, he is extra-special."

Reference URL's