I would never do such things. I have experienced the like, and would not wish it on anyone (well...maybe Jack Thompson).
insanity, if you found this amusing, i feel you need to re-evaluate your outlook about people and life.
same for the lot of you. for shame, for shame...
its not so much that, its the amusement that you (appeared) to find in the humiliation and degradation. I'll admit, the grammar of the letter was abominal, but that in itself should not be amusing; more pitiful, that the person seems unable to construct a coherent sentence.
I myself am guilty of using sarcasm as one would wield a weapon; it is not that that i took offence to.it is the glorification and promotion of such behaviours, by indirectly abbetting the ****** who posted it, by the act of posting and sharing it.
I for one will make a stand here, and i will not back down.
you are completely in the wrong. feel free to open this up to debate, i dont want this to go to PM's, i want everyones point of view here.
sounds like a good idea. by the way, i dont consider you a bad person for being wrong. and debate is healthy
if you would like to begin?
very well; i found the fact that you found the content of the letter, and the circumstances around it amusing, offensive.
sorry about delayed response...
but that itself can be considered a problem; take it in the context of you being the victim (yeah, i know, empathy, not a strong point); if you have been ridiculed, imagine that...someone took footage or a recording of you being ridiculed, and uploaded it to the internet; thousands of people would then know your name, and would be laughing at you.
that letter was written in the passion of the moment, and doesnt make an awful amount of sense; but it was totally wrong of the reciever to have uploaded it in a humourous context.