12-16-2007, 05:14 PM
Just a "conspiracy theory" that striked me.
I've seen some ideas to how chelation and GF/CF could be beneficial for some autistics which actually seem more rational than the usual "neurotoxins" and "drug-effect" theories.
Such theories often seem to be more about relieving stress from constipation. There are anecdotes from parents who said that constipation issues have stopped right after having started GF/CF or done chelation. I don't know if we should take such anecdotes any more seriously than parents who say they have seen a "reduction in autism symptoms" , but such anecdotes definitely seem more specific.
So if these alternative practioneers were aware that these ideas were correct, would they publish it?
If chelation became a mainstream treatment that was used to help autistic patients with gastrointestinal issues wouldn't alternative chelation practioneers lose income? Maybe the whole of DAN! would actually collapse?
A mother at the chatroom has had alot of experience with DAN! I'm not sure if she's still around and she was abit unpopular because she supported the possibility of some DAN! treatments being valid treatments.
For the alternative DAN! treatments many different medications are often given which are all very expensive. The mother at the chatroom told that she carefully removed several medications from the daily meds of her daughter and found that some had benefit (I didn't ask how) and some didn't have any effect whatsoever.
I remember from having read James Laidler's "My involvement with autism quackery" that parents often monitor the medications out of the behavior of their child. So parents might be over-focused on the changes in behavior of their child to see that it is unrelated to the medications. Which could probably make her anecdote unreliable.
Still she also mentioned that her daughter's gastrointestinal issues declined just after having had some kind of treatment. But that this treatment would probably never hit mainstream in any few years because of the controversy around the DAN! organisation.
Theories of some kind of drug effect from eating bread and milk and mercury neuro-poisoning, even conspiracy theories about the government trying to cover up that thimerosal in vaccines are dangerous, are things that probably prevent mainstream medicine from even considering DAN! treatments.
I've seen some ideas to how chelation and GF/CF could be beneficial for some autistics which actually seem more rational than the usual "neurotoxins" and "drug-effect" theories.
Such theories often seem to be more about relieving stress from constipation. There are anecdotes from parents who said that constipation issues have stopped right after having started GF/CF or done chelation. I don't know if we should take such anecdotes any more seriously than parents who say they have seen a "reduction in autism symptoms" , but such anecdotes definitely seem more specific.
So if these alternative practioneers were aware that these ideas were correct, would they publish it?
If chelation became a mainstream treatment that was used to help autistic patients with gastrointestinal issues wouldn't alternative chelation practioneers lose income? Maybe the whole of DAN! would actually collapse?
A mother at the chatroom has had alot of experience with DAN! I'm not sure if she's still around and she was abit unpopular because she supported the possibility of some DAN! treatments being valid treatments.
For the alternative DAN! treatments many different medications are often given which are all very expensive. The mother at the chatroom told that she carefully removed several medications from the daily meds of her daughter and found that some had benefit (I didn't ask how) and some didn't have any effect whatsoever.
I remember from having read James Laidler's "My involvement with autism quackery" that parents often monitor the medications out of the behavior of their child. So parents might be over-focused on the changes in behavior of their child to see that it is unrelated to the medications. Which could probably make her anecdote unreliable.
Still she also mentioned that her daughter's gastrointestinal issues declined just after having had some kind of treatment. But that this treatment would probably never hit mainstream in any few years because of the controversy around the DAN! organisation.
Theories of some kind of drug effect from eating bread and milk and mercury neuro-poisoning, even conspiracy theories about the government trying to cover up that thimerosal in vaccines are dangerous, are things that probably prevent mainstream medicine from even considering DAN! treatments.
)