03-16-2005, 01:13 PM
We took AFF leaflets to the Conference, which we were allowed to place at the entrance for people to take.
We were able to talk to people at Autism Cymru, whom I had previously e-mailed about NAAR UK, asking about the support they were giving NAAR.
Firstly, he said that he had seen the AFF leaflet and supported and agreed with all of our aims, which was very good to hear. He said that he opposed ABA, and we talked about the JRC. On this issue of NAAR he said the he had asked NAAR UK to contact us to discuss their intentions, but I said that they had not done that.
NAAR UK have given the impression to Autism Cymru that they are raising money for research into causes and treatments, and not for a cure. As we can see from NAAR in the US they certainly are looking for a cure. I hope to correspond with NAAR UK and get a specific answer from them.
We talked to Professor Pat Howlin too.
I asked her how she felt about the search for a cure for autism. She felt that it would not happen, and was very unrealistic. She felt that the "core of autism, without the intellectual disabilites" is not negative in itself. She said that the name Cure Autism Now was negative in terminology.
I asked her about MB12 treatments. She had never heard of them, so I explained the basics of it. She said that she was very sceptical, as in the past some medical treatments appear to help in the short term, such as premature babies being given pure oxygen, but there are long term problems that are later seen in the children.
I asked her for her views on mercury as a cause, and she agreed that it was a red herring as a cause for autism. As for MMR vaccines, she said that parents should realise that not vaccinating could cause many more problems for children, as measles can cause brain damage.
I told her how AFF was often criticised for being against the mercury and MMR vaccines, and she said "well I think you are right".
We told her about AFF and she was very interested, and we told her of the chat network. She said that she could tell patients as it was good to have something positive to point them to.
I told her about the pressure on parents on the spectrum from some areas, ie, pressure to abort, or threat of having children taken, and how a prenatal test for autism would increase that greatly, and that unlike down's syndrome where it occured from NT parents, that many autistic kids come from autistic parents, so that we could face being wiped out genetically.
I also told her that CAN was funding the Autism Research Centre where tests had been done on amniotic fluid of women with autism, and how higher testosterone levels had already been found as a factor in unborn babies that later were dx with autism.
She felt that it was not possible to wipe us out entirely as there are people with traits alone who have kids with AS. Gareth exlained how it could have a dramatic effect nevertheless, and Pat mentioned if Einstein had never been born, and the positives that would be lost.
We were really pleased to have the opportunity to discuss these important matters.
We were able to talk to people at Autism Cymru, whom I had previously e-mailed about NAAR UK, asking about the support they were giving NAAR.
Firstly, he said that he had seen the AFF leaflet and supported and agreed with all of our aims, which was very good to hear. He said that he opposed ABA, and we talked about the JRC. On this issue of NAAR he said the he had asked NAAR UK to contact us to discuss their intentions, but I said that they had not done that.
NAAR UK have given the impression to Autism Cymru that they are raising money for research into causes and treatments, and not for a cure. As we can see from NAAR in the US they certainly are looking for a cure. I hope to correspond with NAAR UK and get a specific answer from them.
We talked to Professor Pat Howlin too.
I asked her how she felt about the search for a cure for autism. She felt that it would not happen, and was very unrealistic. She felt that the "core of autism, without the intellectual disabilites" is not negative in itself. She said that the name Cure Autism Now was negative in terminology.
I asked her about MB12 treatments. She had never heard of them, so I explained the basics of it. She said that she was very sceptical, as in the past some medical treatments appear to help in the short term, such as premature babies being given pure oxygen, but there are long term problems that are later seen in the children.
I asked her for her views on mercury as a cause, and she agreed that it was a red herring as a cause for autism. As for MMR vaccines, she said that parents should realise that not vaccinating could cause many more problems for children, as measles can cause brain damage.
I told her how AFF was often criticised for being against the mercury and MMR vaccines, and she said "well I think you are right".
We told her about AFF and she was very interested, and we told her of the chat network. She said that she could tell patients as it was good to have something positive to point them to.
I told her about the pressure on parents on the spectrum from some areas, ie, pressure to abort, or threat of having children taken, and how a prenatal test for autism would increase that greatly, and that unlike down's syndrome where it occured from NT parents, that many autistic kids come from autistic parents, so that we could face being wiped out genetically.
I also told her that CAN was funding the Autism Research Centre where tests had been done on amniotic fluid of women with autism, and how higher testosterone levels had already been found as a factor in unborn babies that later were dx with autism.
She felt that it was not possible to wipe us out entirely as there are people with traits alone who have kids with AS. Gareth exlained how it could have a dramatic effect nevertheless, and Pat mentioned if Einstein had never been born, and the positives that would be lost.
We were really pleased to have the opportunity to discuss these important matters.