Sophie X
Momof Hrick
Mainstream schools are however almost the only option in Norway, and not something that's ever being considered poor as far as I know.
[/quote]
Mainstreaming done correctly (i.e. student gets the amount of support needed for success) is wonderful. When done on the cheap, it only reinforces what a nuscience SPED kids are before they blow out. I spent the last 25 years in Vermont, where they do a beautify job mainstreaming kids. My foster son works for an outside agency that supports school with the most difficult cases (violence, medical) to mainstream safely. I moved to Arizona this summer where I am working with two self-contained classrooms for children with ASDs. They are not as well educated - its just not taken as seriously; they miss so much!! People do not realise that disordered language does not equal not smart, and children with ASDs are smart. (Especially the poop artists)
Both of these options given (of mainstream and special ed) have failed a lot of people. They also have a lot of people who have had good experiences in them.
You are sooooo right!! And I work in the system. It drives me nuts. The paperwork is nuts too. Its all about the paperwork - who has time for all those pesky students!
You can't legislate high quality, compasionate teaching, but I personally feel that a good start would be to define 'highly qualified' as someone who has an undergrad in teaching: curriculum, instruction theory, classroom management, etc. Then people specialize in sped, speech/lang, psychology, reading, math, OT, PT, admin, etc for grad degree. Then, with a sped as lead teacher, all specialties work in the classroom with all the kids for elementary school as collaborators. High schools could specialize: academic, art, trades, etc. All teachers k-12, need to know how to differintiate instruction and how to run a responsive classroom.
One reason NTs think there's is the only way is b/c all others are removed from the classroom. Before IDEA, neurodiversity was not allowed in the classroom. People growing up before the 70s simply never saw a person with differences (the 'good 'ole days, right?). In fact the ONLY people who mattered were wasp males. The elimination of nonNTs was the most successful segregation project ever. I feel for this reason, classes need neurodiversity (inclusion). It needs to be done with care so old sterotypes are not reinforced. An ignorant teacher can do a lot of harm.
My older sister got her special ed degree from indiana university in 1964. Her first job was to go door to door as follow up to rumors that there might be a school-aged child with 'disabilities.' She found some being well cared for, but many were in basements, atticks, etc. No one thought anything about it. They were mostly poor b/c the wealthy could send their kids away. Many, many doctors recommended that babies born with obvious differences (downs & CP, etc) at birth be sent away before parent became attached to them. Kids with autism were also sent "away." Why do you think the asperger & kanner descriptions were of institutionalized people? My friend with autism who presented and mentored, used to mentor an older man who spent his entire childhood into adulthood in an institution. It was very hard for him to speak of it without flipping out. and his words where very disturbing. I am blathering on and on b/c it is so important that people with learning differences are not segregated from mainstream. the only way to be recognized as a human being to let poeple know you.
there is a bumper sticker that reads to the effect of:
It will be a great day when schools get the money they need and the milatary has to hold a bake sale to buy a new bomber.
my son does have NT friends he has known since he was young. bullying wasn't a huge issue because my son is VERY witty and was able to defend himself.
i think the entire mainstream school staff needs to be properly trained when it comes to ASD kids. i saw this youtube video where NT kids are partnered with AS kids to help them how to socialize. it was actually seen as somewhat "cool" by the school population.
in a perfect world i'd like to keep my son in mainstream, but have a more educated staff. if things get worse educationally, i will have to re-think putting my son in a school that specializes in aspergers kids. there is actually one close to my house, but i'' cross that road when we come to it.
I think it greatly depends on the school and how they deal with things. Mind you.....we have a 40% aboriginal student body....dark skin, brown hair, brown eyes and Martin is pale skin with bright red hair......even if he wasn't aspie he'd be a target. But the school fosters tolerence and respect for all people and an acceptence of each person for their own gifts.
We are lucky we moved here.
I also understand that some schools just have no idea at all. Martin's last school was like that. Totally clueless! They made things worse and harder.
I still feel that my school has an amazing program, and it's disappointing that many other schools don't follow this program and force bright students, usually with AS, to remain in special ed for all subjects, instead of just some.
Want to know something interesting? The first private school I went to in 5th grade started a special ed program while I was in 9th grade at my current school. Unknowingly, I was talking at my synagogue to the school's president about my recent awards at a national competition after he approached me to "congratulate me." Shortly after, they formed a special ed program fairly similar in structure to my school's. It's funny how people learn from their mistakes.
Emphasis added.
While this can be true, the bullying problem is very, VERY bad at a lot of schools.
absolutely true...in fact this 8 year old boy hung himself a few weeks ago because of it. it broke my heart when i heard that.