11-09-2007, 11:41 AM
Down a few points. I did not know how to answer several questions, notably those comparing myself to other people. How would I know? I haven't got a clue how "easy" or "hard" something has been for other people. Silliness.
I disagree. I can't see how anyone could make a test that does not do this same thing... I think it goes to the state of mind of the test taker and their honest evaluation of themselves that dictates the answers' accuracy.
Which is to say that the test is also not very reliable. In psychology, as well as in any other science or social science, the the two basic constructs are test validity {does it measure what it purports to measure} and reliability {can we get the same results measuring the same phenomena at the same levels time after time}
http://allpsych.com/researchmethods/vali...ility.html.
Besides the prima facie nature of the questions, there is no degree of measurement, or variation for each concept. It's essentially either a (0) or (1) response since you have to agree that you possess a particular characteristic through introspection. The sum total of the responses is scored without probing as to actual degree degree of manifestation
The test lacks content validity, predictive validity, test-retest reliability...
A test that presents lists of concepts with the test taker identifying among lists that the test taker thinks represents him/her could be used to isolate the actual condition of the test taker as apart from the test taker's opinion of himself/herself.
That's what the occupational test link above did, and that's why it's more accurate.
x
etc.
Great when your weirdness has a name isn't it? 











I agree, but I would be interested to see all of them superimposed, in order to see ( rather than read ) the common characteristics as many of these are from the undiagnosed. 

Your wish is my command! 

Thank you very much,
this is very interesting.
Most of the participants generally fit a particular pattern, which in a way is odd as we are all different.
I wonder what the reasons are, apart from the fact that we have all volunteered...any ideas anyone???
I was surprised by just how autistic mine is. I thought I'd learnt to 'fit in' by now. Obviously not. 
Do you know how you did it?
I was surprised by the amount of autism in mine as well
Well, many of these questions may not be measuring what they are intended to measure. For example, preferring a library to a theater may not be measuring anything other than a person's love of reading. There are many avid readers who are not aspies. It is also possible to be an introvert without being an aspie. It is important to not take these types of tests too seriously.


Your wish is my command! 

Interesting. Here are the averages for AFF (using slightly different groupings):