Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: the Aspie-Quiz revisited...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Hmm... mine went up too... thirty points to 164.

I'm not as aspie as you though, guess I'm not worthy. Wink  That is wierd that my score changed, I wonder if they changed some of the questions?  They had a few in there three times just asked differently. (THat really bothers me when taking a 200 question test...)
Your Aspie score: 113 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 85 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits

I feel that this test has much more loaded questions than the occupational test. For example, if someone is feeling different, that person is more likely to answer the social avoidant, or perhaps the odd posture/ gait questions in the affirmative.

Anyone aware of aspie criteria would be predisposed to answer the questions so as to qualify themselves as either an aspie, or not one.
I left a lot of them question marks.   Mostly the ones asking what other people think, do other people understand me, do other people see me as...etc.  How am I supposed to know that?

Your Aspie score: 153 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 52 of 200
On the 2nd quiz: 33

Not to knock your quiz, or rather, Newsweek for putting it out.

1) However, it is once again full of questions involving your desired level of sociability which should skew the results away from us selecting Aspie characteristics since many of us desire to be sociable.

2) This test lays out the criteria for us to select ourselves as Aspies. The social/ occupational test was a little less direct about the questions so that the test taker could not presuppose the desired intent of the test questions.

Bella Wrote:
There are some things in that test that I hadn't thought of as Aspie, but realised that I do.


This is not to reflect on you in any way, Bella. It's just my harping on the same point, that being:

If we are able to preconceive that a question labels us as Aspie, or not, then the test is not valid.

Batman55 Wrote:
What was the desired intent of the test questions, in that case?


Since you already know the criteria that the test maker is labelling, by self-selecting responses that confirm that you are an Aspie the self diagnosis is a self fulfilling prophesy.

There aren't any variations. It's like binary code. (0) and you aren't an Aspie, (1) and you are an Aspie.

Saint Wrote:
If we are able to preconceive that a question labels us as Aspie, or not, then the test is not valid.


I disagree. I can't see how anyone could make a test that does not do this same thing... all the more reason for the "not a diagnostic tool" disclaimer.  I'm pretty sure if you tried any of these sorts of tests with a mind towards what they're looking for and get a good score... I think it goes to the state of mind of the test taker and their honest evaluation of themselves that dictates the answers' accuracy.  I could probably take a test that classifies me as a million things if I tried to make my answers go that way.

None of these tests are 100% accurate, but from what I've seen on here neither is a professional diagnostic!  Though, admittedly at least with a pro you have someone else to confirm or deny.

I wonder how no one around me could not see the signs in me. Why I don't tell someone in real life what I suspect and what this test shows I don't know.
I really want a professional opinion on my thoughts of me having AS. But I have big problems with asking for help, telling people my thoughts, and starting things. Also I still don’t really now how to go about doing this in Oregon.
Your Aspie score: 176 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 27 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie.
Wish I could edit.
There is a local autism support group, and they might have an Email?
I'll be searching Google and if that comes up with nothing then maybe I'll look in a phone book for a local autism support group.

Hello and thanks.

rdos Wrote:
NT social is closely related to social phobia and a desire to socialize with strangers.


Eh, well, there's also plenty of Aspies who have a social phobia...

babuyagu Wrote:
Personally I don't think this is very accurate, though. I don't know.. I might be very Aspie and just good at hiding it but I don't really think I'm that Aspie.


Well, it looks like you are measuring your perceived Aspieness against the "stereotypical image" of an Aspie, and that is doomed to make you doubt your AS.  There will be plenty who fit the stereotypes perfectly, and just as many that do not.

My point is, spectrumites are all so different and just because we don't fit stereotypes, doesn't mean we have AS "any less" than the next Aspie.

SoccerFreak248 Wrote:
i got really low intellectual scores on this test but my IQ is 140, i don't understand and it makes me feel like a big *** or something


I think the intellectual component might just be about how "systemizing" you are in nature, do you like to figure out what each part of a machine does, do you like to collect train schedules and search for patterns, etc.  If you are not very systemizing in a classically Aspergian way, then you'll probably get a low score for intellectual.  But this has nothing to do with your actual intellect, it is only looking for "tendencies."

babuyagu Wrote:
SocceFreak248: It isn't about your intelligence, it is about whether your intelligence mirrors the Aspie kind or the NT kind. Everyone possesses intelligence to varying degrees and this does not measure that.m


You can also be an Aspie without the Aspie kind of intelligence, and I am an example of this.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reference URL's