Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Why christianity is wrong
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Max the Bear Wrote:
Yetti has lived a privileged life, living off a rich husband. If she didn't have his money and if she were out on her own now, in her current deteriorated mental state, she would desperately need the support of the welfare system.

But because she can live off someone else, she thinks it qualifies her to condemn others. That's the face of right-wing America, ugly as it is.


OH? I lived a priviledge life?   Max you know nothing of my life but you are in the middle of an aspie rage and trying to strike out from your imaginings.   Why do you think I am condeming if I ask people to discuss the subject?  Why is that condemnation?   These are facts.. and just because you don't agree.. it is leading you into an aspie rage if you ARE an aspie.  WHy not you and  some of the others take a time out and cool down?   De stress.... this is priority for aspies....

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Yetti, pull your horns in. You are ranting again. You'll get spittle all over your keyboard.


And you are not discussing the topic as usual . Smile

I find it offensive you insult Guess who's reverence for his parents...

Honor Thy Father and Thy Mother.

Don't u just love folks are pious selectively? Guess please continue... I am interested... Smile


tenaciouscj Wrote:
Maybe, but not to the point when it becomes a total bore.

Yetti Wrote:
Nothing wrong with referencing ones parents on decisions.

tenaciouscj Wrote:

GuessWho Wrote:
I think we forgot about religion.

I think it is kind of interesting that I ended up becoming a Christian because I wanted to live a tranquil, amicable life like my residence assistance friends (Buddhist leaning), but never could.

The RAs would frequently talk me out of my attitude against the campus fellowship.  I especially wanted the follow the example of one Rachael Meads, but I could not.  Then I became a Christian and I stopped having anger management problems at individuals or categories of people.

I did thinking about the charity and foreign students thing too.

No, it is not a Christian thing to refuse them, but it would have been more consistent with the behavior of my parents, who were Lutheran only in name.

Somehow I am doubting they would have done as well for themselves if they could have been talked out of their treasures on earth.  

Ever wonder why people who are more successful often hold on to their money better?

I'm not thinking like a Christian I am thinking like a, well, a Marsh.


GuessWho, I think it's time to think for yourself and not base all your decisions on what your parents would have done. Material success does not mean personal success or success in the eyes of God.

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
I think it isn't fair to post links in threads without telling people what the link is for. You could seriously upset someone. Please post an explanation. Thank you.


Tigger your behavior on many posts have been far more offensive to humanity and Christ.  If you are Christian.. then walk the talk.  don't be selective.. you want others to be pious towards your beliefs when you are not yourself. Hypocrisy Thy name is woman!

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Sorry, I was asking you to be polite to others. It is usual board courtesy to tell people what they are being linked to. I don't recall being offensive, please could you quote the posts?

Thank you.


I would say 98% of the ones referencing me and others.... from yesterday and earlier . Look them up yourself if you don't remember. Smile

You have a tendacy to attack people's posts if you personally do not like them.  Take some time and look back...Selective memory is not an excuse. Wink  You don't qualify for senior moments yet !

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
I do not personally dislike anyone on this board. Please quote at least one offensive post so that I may apologise to whomever I may have inadvertantly offended. I am unable to find it.

Thank you.


Too many to post.. Start with the first day I returned up until Today.. If you are unable to find it , then you are not sorry or you are incapble of knowing that you are offending people.

My suggestion is to make copies of  all these posts the last few days and take them to a therapist to explain to you. They can do a far better job than I can or anyone here for that matter.

I say this with love as an Aspie.

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Just one example, please?

Thank you


Sorry no... I think its best to have someone qualified in personal relationships and communications such as an aspie therapist  to go through the series of the last several days with you in a proper setting and way..

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Oh, so you can't find one either.

Thank you.


Oh yes..80-90%of your posts in context to the threads are. Smile  As I said before.. copy them all in context of the threads and take them to a professional to explain to you.  

I just choose not to take the time to be your therapist on this board since you have had challenges attacking people you disagree... You need to make the effort to want to be able to socialize. I choose not to help you with your wish.

tenaciouscj Wrote:

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:

Yetti Wrote:
I find it offensive you insult Guess who's reverence for his parents...


I didn't.

It's because it's been said so many times that I'm really over it.

Yetti, I now think you have repeated some comments to the point of causing us 100 times more boredom:

"See a therapist for your issues"
"having pity parties".
"Get a job"
and so on, ad nauseum.

I also find your personal attacks on people such as Max, Tigger, Rossco and Sarah quite tedious to say the very least.

The more you say these things, the more we won't want to take any notice. I tried therapy - it only made me feel crappier about myself for the most part. I don't need it - I can manage with just a little bit of practical assistance on occasion.

Therapy helps a few people but unlike the society you live in, people in other countries aren't usually so obssessed about it.


You never took notice from the beginning ..that is your challenge.  As A Deist it is my belief we all make our own heaven or hell right here on Earth. God gives us the power and tools.  If we don't use them ,then it falls back to us.. and NO one else.

A heroine of mine Elizabeth Cady Staton.. the mother of Feminism in America along with Susan B Anthony her life long friend.. wrote "The Solitude of the Self"

Let me share.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article..._cady.html

The Solitude of Self by Elizabeth Cady Stanton
By Lori Voth
Takeaways
The Solitude of Self speech is by Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a key figure in the women's rights movement.
The Solitude of Self is a speech about the sixteenth amendment As president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), Elizabeth Cady Stanton worked closely with other leaders to argue for women's rights. The speech, "Solitude of Self" was delivered before the House Judiciary Committee in Washington on January 18, 1982 along with other testimonies from Susan B. Anthony. It was originally written for the NAWSA convention as Stanton's farewell speech as she gave up her position as president, but she was forced to skip the convention to attend the unexpected, last minute hearings of the House to testify. It is believed that she still delivered the speech to the convention, only at a later time.

The speech is very appropriate for the House audience. Stanton begins by addressing the chairman and the gentlemen of the committee and states that since she "has been speaking before them for the last twenty years and has gone over all the arguments in favor of a sixteenth amendment, it is not necessary to repeat them again." This opening is direct and matter-of-fact and is a good technique for setting the tone of the speech. She is basically saying, "You already know what I'm here for; now let's get down to business." This tactic is very particular to the audience because had she been speaking to a regular public, it may have been necessary to go into the arguments the Association had thus far presented. In this case, the men had already heard them and doing so would have been superfluous. As for the members of the NAWSA, whom the speech was originally written to address for their convention, it is also very appropriate. For them, it again, does not go through all the arguments for women's' rights that they all know so wee, but instead simply describes what each woman deserves. It is persuasive in a subtle way, for it is not really intended to initiate one certain action, but it is more of a subtle persuasive tool to get the crowd motivated and dedicated to their beliefs and rights.

The thesis and main point of the speech is that as an individual, "a woman has the right and the duty to use all her faculties for he own safety and happiness." Stanton's main support for her thesis is the theory of solitude, the idea that each individual must face life alone and that each individual should have an equal opportunity to handle it. She wants us to believe at the end of the speech that in everything we do, each emotional relief or torment we go through, we ultimately experience it alone. She states that although there may be times when things are made easier by someone or something else, in the end we fight for ourselves and therefore we should be given the same opportunities to take care of ourselves.

Stanton begins her argument by setting the stage, listing what belongs to a woman as an individual, as a citizen, and as an equal factor in civilization. She states that under these titles, women are entitled to the same rights as other citizens and other members of civilization, or men. She makes it clear that women should be viewed by what they are, individuals, and not by their roles as mother, daughter or sister because they may never even be that, and as she states, men are not viewed by their role as father or brother.

Her major point to argue for a woman's rights is the isolation of every human soul and that the necessity of self dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings. Stanton states minor arguments under this idea throughout the speech but it is for this reason that she is making every statement, with many different ideas to support it. One supporting idea is that nature set us up as individuals ready for individual action. She explains how every person is different; everything in nature is unique, that "no one has ever found two ribbons of grass alike." We come into this world alone, we have to face it alone, and we leave it alone.

She describes how children when they are too young to analyze or share their feelings of pain have to deal with them alone and she tells a story of a girl who was disappointed at a family Christmas and no matter what was done to help her in the end, she dealt with the pain in solitude. She goes on to list several more instances when we deal with pain alone, such as when facing the death of a loved one, or a defeat by another candidate for a position (presidency), or as a pauper or a criminal in jail. Stanton states," seeing then that life must ever be a march and a battle, that each soldier must be equipped for his own protection, it is the height of cruelty to rob the individual of a single natural right."

To rebut arguments that a woman may be dependent on man and get help from men she claims that still, "to manage a household, have a desirable influence in society…train her children and servants well, he must have rare common sense, wisdom, diplomacy and a knowledge of human nature." She says that a woman trained to be dependent on someone else is a failure in any position and when she is unhappy in her ignorance and embarrassed by her dependence, again, she deals with it alone. She later claims that nothing can "shelter women from the fierce storms of life for they beat on her from every point on every compass, just as they do man…" And again she deals with them in solitude.

Stanton delivers these arguments using simple, matter-of-fact style to get her points across and she does so very effectively. She begins by getting directly to the point. After her introduction to the Chairman and gentleman of the committee, she begins by saying, "The point I wish plainly to bring before you is the individuality of each human soul" Our Protestant idea, the right of individual conscience and judgment, our republican idea, individual citizenship." She elaborates briefly on that and then moves on to secondly, thirdly, and fourthly. This tactic of putting her arguments in order and in their own categories leads us to believe that she knows what she is here to say and that she is prepared and it is all very simple. She uses easy language, not only making it easier for the listeners to grasp, but implying that the matter she is arguing for is simple, nothing detailed or difficult to understand, simply a god given right that women deserve.

An interesting technique Stanton uses is that she makes everything into a statement, as if it is true. There are never any self conscious sentences like "I feel" or "Women feel" and as well she never acts as if she is trying to persuade by saying "I urge you to…" or "Please understand." Instead she says things such as "The isolation of every human soul and the necessity of self-dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings" and "No mortal ever has been, no mortal ever will be like the soul just launched on the sea of life," and "in youth our most bitter disappointments, our brightest hopes and ambitions are known only to ourselves." All of these statements are philosophical but Stanton says them as truth, even though they are things she thought up on her own. This subtly leads the listener to also believe it as truth.

"The Solitude of Self" is also very rich in analogies and Stanton uses many examples for the point she delivers. When asking for the complete development of every individual, "first for his own benefit and happiness" she uses the analogy of fitting an army: "In fitting out an army we give each soldier his own knapsack, arms powder, his blanket, cup, knife, fork and spoon. We provide alike for all their individual necessities, then each man bears his own burden." She also cites an analogy of a satire on woman's position in the nineteenth century from a Shakespeare play, "Titus and Andronicus." She tells of how in the play the king's daughter was taken and her hands and tongue were cut out and then she was told to go call for water and wash her hands. Stanton explains this towards her point saying the woman is "robbed of her natural rights, handicapped by law and custom at every turn, yet compelled to fight her own battles and in the emergencies of life to fall back on herself for protection."

More resources
American Intellectual Tradition: Volume Two, 1865-present, by David Hollinger, Eighty Years and More Reminiscences 1815 to 1897 by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton: Woman Suffrage and the first vote by Dawn Adiletta

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THAT BEING SAID.. 'KNOWLEDGE IS POWER"  As soon as we close our minds to anything new information , we have begun to dig our own graves.


Yetti Wrote:

tenaciouscj Wrote:

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:

Yetti Wrote:
I find it offensive you insult Guess who's reverence for his parents...


I didn't.

It's because it's been said so many times that I'm really over it.

Yetti, I now think you have repeated some comments to the point of causing us 100 times more boredom:

"See a therapist for your issues"
"having pity parties".
"Get a job"
and so on, ad nauseum.

I also find your personal attacks on people such as Max, Tigger, Rossco and Sarah quite tedious to say the very least.

The more you say these things, the more we won't want to take any notice. I tried therapy - it only made me feel crappier about myself for the most part. I don't need it - I can manage with just a little bit of practical assistance on occasion.

Therapy helps a few people but unlike the society you live in, people in other countries aren't usually so obssessed about it.


You never took notice from the beginning ..that is your challenge.  As A Deist it is my belief we all make our own heaven or hell right here on Earth. God gives us the power and tools.  If we don't use them ,then it falls back to us.. and NO one else.

A heroine of mine Elizabeth Cady Staton.. the mother of Feminism in America along with Susan B Anthony her life long friend.. wrote "The Solitude of the Self"

Let me share.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article..._cady.html

The Solitude of Self by Elizabeth Cady Stanton
By Lori Voth
Takeaways
The Solitude of Self speech is by Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a key figure in the women's rights movement.
The Solitude of Self is a speech about the sixteenth amendment As president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), Elizabeth Cady Stanton worked closely with other leaders to argue for women's rights. The speech, "Solitude of Self" was delivered before the House Judiciary Committee in Washington on January 18, 1982 along with other testimonies from Susan B. Anthony. It was originally written for the NAWSA convention as Stanton's farewell speech as she gave up her position as president, but she was forced to skip the convention to attend the unexpected, last minute hearings of the House to testify. It is believed that she still delivered the speech to the convention, only at a later time.

The speech is very appropriate for the House audience. Stanton begins by addressing the chairman and the gentlemen of the committee and states that since she "has been speaking before them for the last twenty years and has gone over all the arguments in favor of a sixteenth amendment, it is not necessary to repeat them again." This opening is direct and matter-of-fact and is a good technique for setting the tone of the speech. She is basically saying, "You already know what I'm here for; now let's get down to business." This tactic is very particular to the audience because had she been speaking to a regular public, it may have been necessary to go into the arguments the Association had thus far presented. In this case, the men had already heard them and doing so would have been superfluous. As for the members of the NAWSA, whom the speech was originally written to address for their convention, it is also very appropriate. For them, it again, does not go through all the arguments for women's' rights that they all know so wee, but instead simply describes what each woman deserves. It is persuasive in a subtle way, for it is not really intended to initiate one certain action, but it is more of a subtle persuasive tool to get the crowd motivated and dedicated to their beliefs and rights.

The thesis and main point of the speech is that as an individual, "a woman has the right and the duty to use all her faculties for he own safety and happiness." Stanton's main support for her thesis is the theory of solitude, the idea that each individual must face life alone and that each individual should have an equal opportunity to handle it. She wants us to believe at the end of the speech that in everything we do, each emotional relief or torment we go through, we ultimately experience it alone. She states that although there may be times when things are made easier by someone or something else, in the end we fight for ourselves and therefore we should be given the same opportunities to take care of ourselves.

Stanton begins her argument by setting the stage, listing what belongs to a woman as an individual, as a citizen, and as an equal factor in civilization. She states that under these titles, women are entitled to the same rights as other citizens and other members of civilization, or men. She makes it clear that women should be viewed by what they are, individuals, and not by their roles as mother, daughter or sister because they may never even be that, and as she states, men are not viewed by their role as father or brother.

Her major point to argue for a woman's rights is the isolation of every human soul and that the necessity of self dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings. Stanton states minor arguments under this idea throughout the speech but it is for this reason that she is making every statement, with many different ideas to support it. One supporting idea is that nature set us up as individuals ready for individual action. She explains how every person is different; everything in nature is unique, that "no one has ever found two ribbons of grass alike." We come into this world alone, we have to face it alone, and we leave it alone.

She describes how children when they are too young to analyze or share their feelings of pain have to deal with them alone and she tells a story of a girl who was disappointed at a family Christmas and no matter what was done to help her in the end, she dealt with the pain in solitude. She goes on to list several more instances when we deal with pain alone, such as when facing the death of a loved one, or a defeat by another candidate for a position (presidency), or as a pauper or a criminal in jail. Stanton states," seeing then that life must ever be a march and a battle, that each soldier must be equipped for his own protection, it is the height of cruelty to rob the individual of a single natural right."

To rebut arguments that a woman may be dependent on man and get help from men she claims that still, "to manage a household, have a desirable influence in society…train her children and servants well, he must have rare common sense, wisdom, diplomacy and a knowledge of human nature." She says that a woman trained to be dependent on someone else is a failure in any position and when she is unhappy in her ignorance and embarrassed by her dependence, again, she deals with it alone. She later claims that nothing can "shelter women from the fierce storms of life for they beat on her from every point on every compass, just as they do man…" And again she deals with them in solitude.

Stanton delivers these arguments using simple, matter-of-fact style to get her points across and she does so very effectively. She begins by getting directly to the point. After her introduction to the Chairman and gentleman of the committee, she begins by saying, "The point I wish plainly to bring before you is the individuality of each human soul" Our Protestant idea, the right of individual conscience and judgment, our republican idea, individual citizenship." She elaborates briefly on that and then moves on to secondly, thirdly, and fourthly. This tactic of putting her arguments in order and in their own categories leads us to believe that she knows what she is here to say and that she is prepared and it is all very simple. She uses easy language, not only making it easier for the listeners to grasp, but implying that the matter she is arguing for is simple, nothing detailed or difficult to understand, simply a god given right that women deserve.

An interesting technique Stanton uses is that she makes everything into a statement, as if it is true. There are never any self conscious sentences like "I feel" or "Women feel" and as well she never acts as if she is trying to persuade by saying "I urge you to…" or "Please understand." Instead she says things such as "The isolation of every human soul and the necessity of self-dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings" and "No mortal ever has been, no mortal ever will be like the soul just launched on the sea of life," and "in youth our most bitter disappointments, our brightest hopes and ambitions are known only to ourselves." All of these statements are philosophical but Stanton says them as truth, even though they are things she thought up on her own. This subtly leads the listener to also believe it as truth.

"The Solitude of Self" is also very rich in analogies and Stanton uses many examples for the point she delivers. When asking for the complete development of every individual, "first for his own benefit and happiness" she uses the analogy of fitting an army: "In fitting out an army we give each soldier his own knapsack, arms powder, his blanket, cup, knife, fork and spoon. We provide alike for all their individual necessities, then each man bears his own burden." She also cites an analogy of a satire on woman's position in the nineteenth century from a Shakespeare play, "Titus and Andronicus." She tells of how in the play the king's daughter was taken and her hands and tongue were cut out and then she was told to go call for water and wash her hands. Stanton explains this towards her point saying the woman is "robbed of her natural rights, handicapped by law and custom at every turn, yet compelled to fight her own battles and in the emergencies of life to fall back on herself for protection."

More resources
American Intellectual Tradition: Volume Two, 1865-present, by David Hollinger, Eighty Years and More Reminiscences 1815 to 1897 by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton: Woman Suffrage and the first vote by Dawn Adiletta

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Schätze der Welt
Treasure of Mankind

http://www.schaetze-der-welt.de/

WE PRESERVE WHAT WE LOVE
WE LOVE WHAT WE UNDERSTAND
WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED


Yetti Wrote:
THAT BEING SAID.. 'KNOWLEDGE IS POWER"  As soon as we close our minds to anything new information , we have begun to dig our own graves.


Yetti Wrote:

tenaciouscj Wrote:

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:

Yetti Wrote:
I find it offensive you insult Guess who's reverence for his parents...


I didn't.

It's because it's been said so many times that I'm really over it.

Yetti, I now think you have repeated some comments to the point of causing us 100 times more boredom:

"See a therapist for your issues"
"having pity parties".
"Get a job"
and so on, ad nauseum.

I also find your personal attacks on people such as Max, Tigger, Rossco and Sarah quite tedious to say the very least.

The more you say these things, the more we won't want to take any notice. I tried therapy - it only made me feel crappier about myself for the most part. I don't need it - I can manage with just a little bit of practical assistance on occasion.

Therapy helps a few people but unlike the society you live in, people in other countries aren't usually so obssessed about it.


You never took notice from the beginning ..that is your challenge.  As A Deist it is my belief we all make our own heaven or hell right here on Earth. God gives us the power and tools.  If we don't use them ,then it falls back to us.. and NO one else.

A heroine of mine Elizabeth Cady Staton.. the mother of Feminism in America along with Susan B Anthony her life long friend.. wrote "The Solitude of the Self"

Let me share.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article..._cady.html

The Solitude of Self by Elizabeth Cady Stanton
By Lori Voth
Takeaways
The Solitude of Self speech is by Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a key figure in the women's rights movement.
The Solitude of Self is a speech about the sixteenth amendment As president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), Elizabeth Cady Stanton worked closely with other leaders to argue for women's rights. The speech, "Solitude of Self" was delivered before the House Judiciary Committee in Washington on January 18, 1982 along with other testimonies from Susan B. Anthony. It was originally written for the NAWSA convention as Stanton's farewell speech as she gave up her position as president, but she was forced to skip the convention to attend the unexpected, last minute hearings of the House to testify. It is believed that she still delivered the speech to the convention, only at a later time.

The speech is very appropriate for the House audience. Stanton begins by addressing the chairman and the gentlemen of the committee and states that since she "has been speaking before them for the last twenty years and has gone over all the arguments in favor of a sixteenth amendment, it is not necessary to repeat them again." This opening is direct and matter-of-fact and is a good technique for setting the tone of the speech. She is basically saying, "You already know what I'm here for; now let's get down to business." This tactic is very particular to the audience because had she been speaking to a regular public, it may have been necessary to go into the arguments the Association had thus far presented. In this case, the men had already heard them and doing so would have been superfluous. As for the members of the NAWSA, whom the speech was originally written to address for their convention, it is also very appropriate. For them, it again, does not go through all the arguments for women's' rights that they all know so wee, but instead simply describes what each woman deserves. It is persuasive in a subtle way, for it is not really intended to initiate one certain action, but it is more of a subtle persuasive tool to get the crowd motivated and dedicated to their beliefs and rights.

The thesis and main point of the speech is that as an individual, "a woman has the right and the duty to use all her faculties for he own safety and happiness." Stanton's main support for her thesis is the theory of solitude, the idea that each individual must face life alone and that each individual should have an equal opportunity to handle it. She wants us to believe at the end of the speech that in everything we do, each emotional relief or torment we go through, we ultimately experience it alone. She states that although there may be times when things are made easier by someone or something else, in the end we fight for ourselves and therefore we should be given the same opportunities to take care of ourselves.

Stanton begins her argument by setting the stage, listing what belongs to a woman as an individual, as a citizen, and as an equal factor in civilization. She states that under these titles, women are entitled to the same rights as other citizens and other members of civilization, or men. She makes it clear that women should be viewed by what they are, individuals, and not by their roles as mother, daughter or sister because they may never even be that, and as she states, men are not viewed by their role as father or brother.

Her major point to argue for a woman's rights is the isolation of every human soul and that the necessity of self dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings. Stanton states minor arguments under this idea throughout the speech but it is for this reason that she is making every statement, with many different ideas to support it. One supporting idea is that nature set us up as individuals ready for individual action. She explains how every person is different; everything in nature is unique, that "no one has ever found two ribbons of grass alike." We come into this world alone, we have to face it alone, and we leave it alone.

She describes how children when they are too young to analyze or share their feelings of pain have to deal with them alone and she tells a story of a girl who was disappointed at a family Christmas and no matter what was done to help her in the end, she dealt with the pain in solitude. She goes on to list several more instances when we deal with pain alone, such as when facing the death of a loved one, or a defeat by another candidate for a position (presidency), or as a pauper or a criminal in jail. Stanton states," seeing then that life must ever be a march and a battle, that each soldier must be equipped for his own protection, it is the height of cruelty to rob the individual of a single natural right."

To rebut arguments that a woman may be dependent on man and get help from men she claims that still, "to manage a household, have a desirable influence in society…train her children and servants well, he must have rare common sense, wisdom, diplomacy and a knowledge of human nature." She says that a woman trained to be dependent on someone else is a failure in any position and when she is unhappy in her ignorance and embarrassed by her dependence, again, she deals with it alone. She later claims that nothing can "shelter women from the fierce storms of life for they beat on her from every point on every compass, just as they do man…" And again she deals with them in solitude.

Stanton delivers these arguments using simple, matter-of-fact style to get her points across and she does so very effectively. She begins by getting directly to the point. After her introduction to the Chairman and gentleman of the committee, she begins by saying, "The point I wish plainly to bring before you is the individuality of each human soul" Our Protestant idea, the right of individual conscience and judgment, our republican idea, individual citizenship." She elaborates briefly on that and then moves on to secondly, thirdly, and fourthly. This tactic of putting her arguments in order and in their own categories leads us to believe that she knows what she is here to say and that she is prepared and it is all very simple. She uses easy language, not only making it easier for the listeners to grasp, but implying that the matter she is arguing for is simple, nothing detailed or difficult to understand, simply a god given right that women deserve.

An interesting technique Stanton uses is that she makes everything into a statement, as if it is true. There are never any self conscious sentences like "I feel" or "Women feel" and as well she never acts as if she is trying to persuade by saying "I urge you to…" or "Please understand." Instead she says things such as "The isolation of every human soul and the necessity of self-dependence must give each individual the right to choose his own surroundings" and "No mortal ever has been, no mortal ever will be like the soul just launched on the sea of life," and "in youth our most bitter disappointments, our brightest hopes and ambitions are known only to ourselves." All of these statements are philosophical but Stanton says them as truth, even though they are things she thought up on her own. This subtly leads the listener to also believe it as truth.

"The Solitude of Self" is also very rich in analogies and Stanton uses many examples for the point she delivers. When asking for the complete development of every individual, "first for his own benefit and happiness" she uses the analogy of fitting an army: "In fitting out an army we give each soldier his own knapsack, arms powder, his blanket, cup, knife, fork and spoon. We provide alike for all their individual necessities, then each man bears his own burden." She also cites an analogy of a satire on woman's position in the nineteenth century from a Shakespeare play, "Titus and Andronicus." She tells of how in the play the king's daughter was taken and her hands and tongue were cut out and then she was told to go call for water and wash her hands. Stanton explains this towards her point saying the woman is "robbed of her natural rights, handicapped by law and custom at every turn, yet compelled to fight her own battles and in the emergencies of life to fall back on herself for protection."

More resources
American Intellectual Tradition: Volume Two, 1865-present, by David Hollinger, Eighty Years and More Reminiscences 1815 to 1897 by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton: Woman Suffrage and the first vote by Dawn Adiletta

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No apology is needed.. We learn from each other... I was not offended in the least.. Thank you... though... but I think too many worry about offending people. .You were fine...

quickduck Wrote:

GuessWho Wrote:
What do Dostum and Palpatine have to do with Christianity?


quickduck Wrote:
Well Dostum was a follower of Islam and Palpatine was Darth Sidious, evil lord of the Sith--so I suppose to a christian they both represent 'the dark side of the force'


Yetti Wrote:
That is incorrect.. Dostum is a communist and Atheist.. he was born muslim but is not...He was an officer with the Soviets and turned on them during the war... He is a staunch atheist and promotes womens rights in his territory.... I read all about him.


Apologises…I’ve done some research--you are correct it this matter. I was having a bit of fun--but should have made an effort to be better informed.

Lucie.. I truly do not understand how people are getting hot and bothered by things.. I do believe there is a huge cultural/educational/age/interests difference going on here...

When I see a challenging discussion.. I go into a logic mode.. and start.. I guess I don't pay attention how people take it in their lives since I consider this forum all words and just communcation and not reflective on ones status quo. I am obviously wrong!

My husband knows I cannot read social cues and on the internet its even more difficult..

In the real world I usually wait until i call him over and ask him for an NT interpretation before I continue... Sometimes he looks at me across the room adn I have that look in my eye.. Like "I Haven't a clue what you are saying " and he comes by me and I ask him for an interpretation as if NTism is a foreign language..

In fact.. I usually just say to him.. Interpret please! LOL  after 32 yrs he knows automatically..

I always thought it was because I grew up in a bilingual family and I did not fully understand the AMerican way of things.. LOL but my psychiatrist said that mistake of mind... saved me in many ways because I thought my Czech cultural challenges were really those of  social challenges as an aspie Smile

The joke was on ME all these decades!!!!!!! ha!

what a HOOT!  



Lucie1 Wrote:

Yetti Wrote:
No apology is needed.. We learn from each other... I was not offended in the least.. Thank you... though... but I think too many worry about offending people. .You were fine...


You are nice Yetti - I pick a real goodness in you.

oh - quickduck - you are nice also (of course).

That is because you are part of this group who is delusional. I will stand by my opinion.. that too many who are long term here and not diagnosed or seeking outside help.. Need to...

You dismiss any new person who comes here and see the emotional challenges happening. I am not the first nor wil be the last... You will just attract others who are delusional adn pat each other on the back everytime they have had enough of this over blattering by those who have time on their hands and no lives anywhere else.

By the way.. Note the YOU YOU YOU and I I I.. Wink

What is so obvious that  I am soooo correct is that you all live in areas where there are state psychiatrists and every one is making an excuse as to why they don't NEED to go !@

Hahahahahaha....  Its like the phrase.. I am not Crazy.. EVERYONE ELSE IS! BECAUSE I SAY SO.

BTW This is from a diagnosed aspie... so there is NO discrimniation.. I call it like I see it.


woman from mars Wrote:

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
I do not personally dislike anyone on this board. Please quote at least one offensive post so that I may apologise to whomever I may have inadvertantly offended. I am unable to find it..

I personally have seen nothing that Tigger has said to be offensive to anyone.
***************************
To anyone who believes the contrary.......I think that there are a few on this forum.

It is perfectly possible to disagree with someone and not dislike them.
Many people enjoy a heated debate...this how we mentally evolve & learn from others, not sweetly agreeing with all that is said by all.

Should offense be taken by a person's opinions being disagreed with by another....that is tough.....the offended one would be better not participating in an argument / debate.

This of course is entirely different from a one sided rant where the person ranting is flinging intentional and hurtful insults at all who dare to disagree with them in any way whatsoever.

Lucie1 Wrote:

woman from mars Wrote:
It is perfectly possible to disagree with someone and not dislike them.

I agree - I don't dislike anyone - I believe Yetti made a similar comment.
People interpret things differently.
Be boring if we were all the same (though - - more peaceful, maybe)


Lucie I Love everyone here... hence I am honest.. My years of experience know what is going on and what is going to happen to many here... I love them..but I for one will not let this one sided dysfunction perpetrating here bring me down with them...

Like any other mentally challenged group .. you have to let them hit rock bottom... if they do not want to help themselves..

Its so sad to see and I have seen this too many times in my life by people who litterally shot themselves in the foot and ended up instituitionalized or even more horrific self destruction.

But i love them.. and I know .. no on can do anything for them until they "WANNA".. THEY DON"T WANNA!

And they make the excuse people don't like them.. which is not reality...

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Reference URL's