Doctor's face looks puzzled, then realises what I've said (I'm 49) and suddenly twigs - women don't suddenly get disorders at the time of diagnosis! (Well, duh as my kids might say!)
I've gotten similar weirdness from laypeople. If I say I was diagnosed with autism at the age of 14, some people say "But you can't become autistic at the age of 14!" (Well, yeah, the initial diagnosis was based heavily on a developmental history given by my mother. Hello!?)
I actually tend to think that self-diagnosis requires more reflection on things than official diagnosis does. And I even move away from the idea of self-diagnosis into self-identification because diagnosis sounds really medical. Being officially diagnosed did not require my comprehension of what diagnosis was being given or what it meant. I didn't have to know anything about autism, and I really didn't know much of anything about it. I didn't even have to participate in the discussions that initially led to the diagnosis. So why is that more important than the understanding I gained later by finding out more about autism?
I like the idea of self-identification in preference to self-diagnosis. Illnesses are diagnosed, and autism is not an illness.
The difference between official diagnosis and self-diagnosis can be like the difference between notional assent and real assent and understanding to being autistic.
It was not until after several months of reading about autism and writings by autistics, both offline and online, before I finally self-diagnosed/self-identified as autistic.
I get the impression that people here (on AFF) think my problems are more related to such issues as "entitlement" and "laziness" than AS itself. And therefore see it as a case of using the AS label as an excuse.
I don't understand why you get that impression.
Is is perhaps more of a worry for you that people will think this - rather than a reality?
It's a bit of a worry but also has some genuine ramifications, as I'll readily admit that my case of AS is either lesser or more uncertain than most others here, for various reasons.
For one thing, I seem to be the only one here who takes everything personally, suggesting this is un-Aspie-like in nature and perhaps something an Aspie wouldn't do. I also seem to be one of the most emotionally volatile members, one of very few who express feelings so readily.
Communicating in ways different than other members here goes against the validity of a self-DX. That's a concern, for me anyhow.
From what I've read about Asperger's, it's not so uncommon for us to be emotionally volatile. The idea that we are all unemotional like Dr Spock is yet another one of the many stereotypes about autism that abound in our society.
For one thing, I seem to be the only one here who takes everything personally, suggesting this is un-Aspie-like in nature and perhaps something an Aspie wouldn't do. I also seem to be one of the most emotionally volatile members, one of very few who express feelings so readily.
I've noticed that you do seem to take personally posts that are not directed to you. It's almost as if some kind of internal critic is activated by what someone says and it triggers insecurity or anger or whatever in response. So you have this reaction, and, as a thread reader, I think: "Say what?" "C'mon Batman, the person was saying what he or she thinks--you're not a target and you don't have to fit with it or agree with it." It's made me puzzled about what theory of mind you are operating with. Seriously. I've been tempted at times to add the qualifier (Note to Batman, I'm not talking about you) but doing so would be ridiculous.
In this case, however, Note to Batman: I am talking about you. You are a puzzle.
Also many self diagnosed are older,( some very much older ) than the officially diagnosed, have puzzled about things & likely thought that there was something wrong for many years.
To finally find an answer... that we just have different wiring often comes as huge relief.
Yup!
And sometimes I still think there's something wrong. But all in all I've had a good and an interesting life. I feel grateful. But parts of it majorly sucked until I got into my late 20s. It's hard to be clueless, to not feel normal, to wonder what is wrong and why. Later on, it's fun to celebrate uniqueness.
My opinion--I think it's natural for parents to encourage their kids to work to improve on their weaknesses, thereby making for an overall well-rounded person. For aspie kids, though, it might make more sense to encourage kids to improve on their strengths to help to solidify skills and self-worth.
i am brand new to this site(today) and new to the world of AS. this is one of the first threads that ive read here because ive been concerned about the whole diagnosis issue. reading this has really cleared up alot of things for me.
i will not seek a professional DX. furthermore i will not even consider myself self DX'd. oh, im aspie alright(first time ive admited this) , but a DX implies that something is wrong with me that needs to be fixed. this couldnt be more wrong. there is nothing wrong with me, and i think that is what this site is really about. were just different, maybe even better than the rest.
i think im going to fit in here just fine. and thats all i need to know. id like to thank you guys and gals for giving me a really great warm feeling inside. one that im not sure ive ever felt. a true sense of belonging.
i know im getting a little off topic but this seemed like the best place to put my...drumroll please...first AFF post!!!
wow, i was afraid of this...
once again, thanks for the really warm welcome to AFF. i really love it. however, i dont want to be known as that guy who ruined that one thread, turning it into his own little welcome party

so id like to ask that any further welcome to AFF's be directed to me directly via PM. seriously, i love it and probably need it but lets stay ON TOPIC so that the next guy or gal can enjoy this thread.
It could be something of a matter of interpretation as to what constitutes autism-related costs as the insurance companies might try to squib out of paying for the cost of treating co-morbids such as depression and bipolar or other conditions which frequently interact with the autism.
It isn't always easy to tease out how much of a person's troubles are due primarily to autism and how much to any co-morbids they might have. Each aspect is likely to amplify the effects of the other/s, and it would take the wisdom of Solomon to determine a fair pay-out.
Oh yeah, I got another lecture from my mother-in-law tonight about how I'm really intelligent and that she doesn't want me to waste my talent. That she understands that my coping skills are less but that I can finish college anyway and get a job with that college degree fulfilling my intellectual abilities.
I would rather do the stuff I'd dreamt of doing, but that doesn't mean that it's something that's a realistic plan for the nearby future. Being an aspie married to an aspie and being a mom of a 4mo baby without any money just does not put me in any position to go and finish college. I don't have the energy or the money. I'm proud of how I'm managing, but other people just bitch about me wasting my talent. I doubt that I'm going to be a truck driver for the next 40 years, but for now it seems like a good choice considering my strengths and weaknesses and the needs of me and my family.
Marieke, I think taking care of a family takes plenty of intelligence and you're young so there is plenty of time to worry about going back to school later on if that's what you wish to do.
I also agree with your other comment that an emergency C-Section is NOT a normal part of birth.
If I was 168 pounds, would I still be invisible to women? God, I wish I knew.
im 165 at most, i am still invisible to women.
It's difficult, because on the one hand I'm not ashamed of being autistic, but on the other hand I don't want to go around shouting it from the rooftops, because I feel it should just be something that is accepted with as little fuss as the colour of my eyes or the fact I'm female, IYSWIM.
Don't know if that makes any sense...probably a bit idealistic!
B
I feel exactly the same 
But insurance will get too expensive if it pays for all these treatments.
Here are my thoughts:
Its not good for anyone to self-diagnose with anything. There are too many common charecteristics between things as well as I have seen people self diagnose for these two reasons and both piss me off:
1: As an excuse for them wanting to be a jackass they just claim 'I have Aspergers'. I use to work for one of these idiots.
2: Because its the latest and greatest fad to get attention from people.
If you self diagnose you dont have Aspergers you THINK YOU HAVE ASPERGERS.
I tend to also disapprove of the term self-diagnosis, but for very different reasons. Diagnosis sounds very medicalized, I prefer 'self-identified' or something to describe people that other people call 'self-diagnosed'.
And no, your last sentence makes absolutely no sense. Someone is either autistic, or they are not autistic. If they are autistic, then this does not change whether they are unidentified, self-identified, or professionally diagnosed. The person does not become autistic at the moment of professional diagnosis, the person was always autistic regardless of who, if anyone, noticed that they were autistic. The 'logic' you are using would make it so that an autistic person is not autistic until a medical professional notices that they are, which is like saying that a redwood tree is not a redwood tree until a botanist comes and tells it it's a redwood tree.
I don't think that the 'jackass' thing is actually that common. I think that a lot of people want it to be common, however, and their constant complaining about it furthers the stereotype. There are a few reasons to want it to be common:
1. Some autistic people don't want to be identified with the stereotype, so instead of saying it's a stereotype, they say "Oh I'm not like that" in the hopes that complaining about 'self-diagnosed jackasses' will differentiate them, themselves, from those 'jackasses'. It's a status thing.
2. Other people, they just want to continue to be able to ridicule autistic people, and it's really hard to ridicule them and stay really pissed off at them if they can be said to have a condition causing them to not understand or be unable to comply with certain social norms.
3. Other people just want to reinforce the social norms in other ways, and therefore want to be able to redefine autistic people's trouble with them as a moral problem rather than a neurological variation. So they do this so they can keep moralizing about how awful autistic people's manners are, without feeling guilty about it.
And a lot of people will claim to know all these people who are "really doing that," but it's really in order to denigrate an entire category of people without having to think about it. It's sort of like people who rant about gay people and use the excuse that they knew a gay child molester once. (Even though straight child molesters are more common.) It's using a single example to reinforce a broad prejudice.
Most of these are just attacks on autistic people who for whatever reason have not been willing or able to seek out a professional to tell them this aspect of who they are (as if they can't possibly know who they are without a professional). People who can't afford professional diagnosis, who reject it on principle as too medical, who are afraid to confront psychiatry another time to get a diagnosis after horrible experiences in the psych system, people whose families refuse to pay for a diagnosis, etc. You're trashing all those people just so you can call a few people jackasses. I hope you're happy with that.