Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Official vs self diagnosis
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Natalie Wrote:
All that said, some non-AS people try to use the condition as an excuse for their laziness, unemployment, shortcomings, lack of friends, or what have you, and I think that's what gives the rest of the self-diagnosers a bad rap.


Anyhow you look at it, getting AS diagnosis or self-DX is going to provide any given individual with one of those "now I know there's a reason for my unusual behavior," etc.  If we are going to call a lot of unusual behavior "shortcomings," which they would (mostly) be seen as before a person knew they had AS, then that doesn't do justice to the valuable self-insight gained upon DX or self-DX.

When asked more directly about it in the past, I was quite honest when I answered that yes, there is an element of "now I have an excuse to suck" in my personal discovery of AS.  That said, I have only mentioned AS once to my parents and I blame my own poor decision-making for most of my current troubles.

But yes I have a tendency to complain and make excuses to evade things, and it has been a lifelong tendency of mine and I'm sorry that it seems this personal characteristic makes all the other self-DXers here look so bad.  If I could imply that from some of the indirect comments made recently on this topic.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?  Am I a major player in this "bad trend" on AFF that Bardwolf/Ando first brought to light?

Lucie1 Wrote:
However - I can understand that some people may feel their struggle is undermined by others who appear to be coping so well in the world - in spite of a self diagnosis of an ASD condition.


I am not "coping that well" in the world right now, but the issue is that people think it is laziness and stubborn inflexibility with me, and I get the impression that people here (on AFF) think my problems are more related to such issues as "entitlement" and "laziness" than AS itself.  And therefore see it as a case of using the AS label as an excuse.

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Boy, do we need that sadly non-existent 'edit button'!

I agree that people have been known to fake back disorders (which was probably why it took so long for my severe arthritis to be diagnosed Sad) but an ASD? When there is SO much prejudice around? I somehow doubt it. Most people have never even HEARD of Asperger's until someone they know is diagnosed.

Given the attitude amongst a large segment of the population why would anyone want to risk being labelled '***' by their mates just to say

Quote:
"now I have an excuse to suck"


I don't think I meant it the way you think I did, Tigger, and anyhow... being compulsively honest about every thought in my head sometimes looks more like a fault than a virtue.  (more of a fault here, as you were bothered by what I said)

What can I say.. Aspies can be too honest.

Lucie1 Wrote:

Batman55 Wrote:
I get the impression that people here (on AFF) think my problems are more related to such issues as "entitlement" and "laziness" than AS itself.And therefore see it as a case of using the AS label as an excuse.

I don't understand why you get that impression.
Is is perhaps more of a worry for you that people will think this - rather than a reality?


It's a bit of a worry but also has some genuine ramifications, as I'll readily admit that my case of AS is either lesser or more uncertain than most others here, for various reasons.

For one thing, I seem to be the only one here who takes everything personally, suggesting this is un-Aspie-like in nature and perhaps something an Aspie wouldn't do.  I also seem to be one of the most emotionally volatile members, one of very few who express feelings so readily.

Communicating in ways different than other members here goes against the validity of a self-DX.  That's a concern, for me anyhow.

energeia Wrote:
I've noticed that you do seem to take personally posts that are not directed to you. It's almost as if some kind of internal critic is activated by what someone says and it triggers insecurity or anger or whatever in response.So you have this reaction, and, as a thread reader, I think:"Say what?" "C'mon Batman, the person was saying what he or she thinks--you're not a target and you don't have to fit with it or agree with it."It's made me puzzled about what theory of mind you are operating with.Seriously.I've been tempted at times to add the qualifier (Note to Batman, I'm not talking about you) but doing so would be ridiculous.

In this case, however, Note to Batman:I am talking about you.You are a puzzle.


One possibility for this specific problem you're pointing out, is a lack of self-concept, lack of firm identity... which to me relates to my AS.  I've read that lack of a clear personality/identity, is a problem for some spectrumites.

matthe Wrote:

GuessWho Wrote:
If I was 168 pounds, would I still be invisible to women?God, I wish I knew.


im 165 at most, i am still invisible to women.


Somewhere between 150-160 lbs here, and almost certainly invisible.  Unless, perhaps, I'm missing the "subtle" signals...?

Simen Wrote:
I think people are entitled to be skeptical of self diagnoses (it's a simple fact that most people will not be qualified to make diagnoses), but that's not any good reason to exclude them from sites like this.


Well, I have every right to be here.  I have been nothing but honest about my lack of an official diagnosis, and the reasons why I haven't been able to get one.  Given that honesty, I think people should believe me when I say I've at least got an informal diagnosis of ADHD from my last therapist--it's not on paper or official because he didn't think it needed to be official, e.g. I wasn't in school at that time.

So at the very least I'm certain of having some kind of neurodiversity, whether that extends beyond ADHD (and I believe it does) is something I haven't had the resources--or the support--to pursue yet.

ocampo Wrote:
can't understand - can understand. Doh.


I have faced that specific criticism you're talking about, here before, and most certainly behind my back by various members who don't approve of some things I say.

Truth is, I'd have the same problems with myself whether I was aware of Asperger's or not.  Now I at least understand why I have them.

bridie Wrote:
I think people know themselves best


But there are actually quite a lot of different conditions that have elements that can present, or seem to present, like AS.
[/quote]

Well, having done some research on these different conditions, I have to say I do not believe any single personality disorder can mimic AS effectively, except for Schizoid PD.  That one is actually pretty close to behavioral characteristics of AS.

All the other personality disorders, in my opinion, could be comorbids but basically it would be hard to confuse personality disorder(s) with AS in my opinion.  Basically if you think you have AS, you probably do.

As far as conditions besides personality disorders--common ones include ADHD, OCD, Bipolar and their "variants."  All of these share some things in common with AS, especially ADHD.  So yes I think some confusion could happen here.

But still, I'm of the opinion that if you've done a lot of research and have communicated at length with others who have the condition, and you still think you have AS, I don't find anything wrong with giving yourself the label.  Everyone needs an identity--especially those (like me) who never had one.

A True Monotheist Wrote:
… Before I was diagnosed, I was self-diagnosed, with an unofficial "Aspie" score of 173/200, and a 48/200 NT score.  …  In any case, I was self-diagnosed, before I got an official diagnosis.  How would I have known to get an official diagnosis if I had not had the good sense to unofficially diagnose myself? Ask yourselves that.


Good point! I started with the WiredAQ Test in 2002, my son was born in 2003 and got his DX in 2005, only then I self-dxed in 2006 and finally got an official DX November 2007. Without being able to have a look around in the forums I would never have had the idea to get dxed, so I think being self-dxed was just part of the way I had to go.

Well Janet never a cross word has come between us, but you'll have to accept that I don't find early intervention half as enchanting as you seem to find it.  I'm with Jewelie on this.  Let a kid be, except in severe circumstances.

DW_a_mom Wrote:
You will affect that change much more rapidly than you will be able to change how the world works.  


I'm going to snip your post down to just the intentionally snide statement above, which perturbed me.  I'll be a brat and say I have no time for someone who likes to patronize my opinions, so you won't see any of my posts paying notice to you, in the future.  Your loss.

Janet Wrote:
And we can disagree until the cows come home without a cross word.  

I wonder if you are assuming ABA.  I am much more of an engagement with a sprinkle of ABA for specific behaviors that are barriers to communicating and learning and not solved by visual support systems & a good sensory diet.  

However, ABA has been demonstrated to have usefulness as a sole intervention and taking data is a breeze.  I also work my hiney off to empower parents to be co-therapists.  Get a parent on board, and the progress can be very exciting.

I am in favor of early intervention b/c the brain has more plasticity and so organic changes are easier to influence and are greater.  “acquisition of a normal language is guaranteed for children up to the age of six, is steadily compromised from then until shortly after puberty, and is rare thereafter” (Pinker 1994, p. 293).

Communication is essential for a person to take control of their own lives, and language comes easier to a very young child than any other time in the life span.  

Language acquisition can be verbal, sign, PECS, or voice output devise.

One of the reasons I am attracted to "engagement" intervention is that 'play is a child's' work.  So my kids do play with me frequently, but you hit paydirt when you get kids with communication challenges interaction frequently with a variety of peers with a variety of strengths.  Then the adults just need to make sure that a way to communicate is available AND the child is not in a self contained classroom with a bunch of adults and limited peer interactions.

I walked in on a meeting today (I had one right before so I was late).  They were going to pull a kindy out of a regular ed classroom because the teacher couldn't tollerate the melt downs.  

By the time I left, the child was back in classroom full-time, had visual schedules etc, whole class sensory breaks at least every 60 minutes  (teacher doing sensory activities as part of regular classroom transitions), and teacher & paras participating in professional development in autism.


You wanted to know why I said you were too intellectual for me to understand before, and now you have your answer.  I understood almost nothing you wrote in the above post.

DW_a_mom Wrote:

Lucario Wrote:
Why are you "happy" as an Aspie? It's a question.


Batman55 Wrote:

DW_a_mom Wrote:
You will affect that change much more rapidly than you will be able to change how the world works.  


I'm going to snip your post down to just the intentionally snide statement above, which perturbed me.  I'll be a brat and say I have no time for someone who likes to patronize my opinions, so you won't see any of my posts paying notice to you, in the future.  Your loss.


Nothing snide was intended.  I am sorry you saw it that way.

My perspective was simply that as a practical matter I could have told my son's teachers until I was blue in the face that he is just a kid, and should be allowed to be who he is, but until I had a professional behind me saying that he can't be force into a mold, no one was listening to me.  It was easier for the preschool director, for example, to decide that my son was the way he was because I was a bad parent, than because his brain was wired differently, and, yes, that preschool director as much as told me that my son wouldn't act the way he did if I was doing my job as a mom.  So, no one was about to 'let him be" until I was able to have a professional say, "hey, he's an Aspie, stop trying to make him NT, and stop blaming the parents!"  If that sounds snide, I am sorry; it is not snide towards you.  It is anger I still have left towards that preschool director, who made my child's life diffcult for several years and I have horrible guilt that I couldn't at the time see it for what it was.  I am simply grateful that I have encountered far wiser professionals at our elementary school.


I didn't consider that this might have led to a greater understanding of your child's behavior (a good thing), and I suppose that is why I responded in such a brash way, earlier.  Sometimes I just miss the small facts which are usually obvious to most people, but not to me..  sorry.

Janet Wrote:
Additionally, the brain remains "plastic" thoroughout the lifespan.  During brain growth & maturation (until the age of 21) plasticity is most productive.


Any way you look at it, though, I had attentional and learning difficulties from age of 0 to the age of 21, and they didn't "budge" despite doing work in the trouble areas.  I refer to my schooling and the variety of social interactions I had up to the age of 21.  I still have the same "mental blocks" I had then, now.  My social anxiety is perhaps worse now, than it was at 18 (when I was very social.)

So, I do not think brain plasticity is the "be all, end all" of what a person can do with their cognition once they hit adulthood.  We have things unique to our neurology young, and a lot of these same quirks, strengths, deficits tend to stay the same when we get older, despite work in the trouble areas.

I mean, could you argue that if I had been forced to join more extracurricular activities (such as sports) when younger (in those "most plastic" of all years), I'd be a more capable human being now?  I think the reverse could be true, I'd have been so terrible due to my attentional problems, trouble following directions, and mild dyspraxia, the social embarrassment would have lowered my self-esteem and I might be worse for the cause, and not better.

I was never "forced" into extracurricular activities, as an aside... is that bad parenting you think, or just my style (because of extreme anxiety, I hated those things) ??

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Reference URL's