so true!
I'd rather be put on fire on a torture rack thank you very much, than listening to that pathetic sorry drivel.
This is her inspiring story.
Inspiring story my arse.
When we discovered our daughter was female we were determined to help her overcome her femaleness.
When we discovered our son was autistic were determined to help him overcome his autism.
When we discovered our daughter was female we were determined to help her overcome her femaleness.
When we discovered our son was autistic were determined to help him overcome his autism.
Well put, hardly much of a differance between the two.
The children started the programme aged 3-4 years when the brain is said to be more malleable. Follow-up studies are being carried out on these children, who are now in their twenties and thirties, and there is no sign of autism.
Isn't that untrue? I read that it has never been proven that the method actually works as it says. And I also read somewhere that with a lot of these kids the autism 'comes back' when they are older.
it's almost boring isn't it?
poor deluded fools!
The children started the programme aged 3-4 years when the brain is said to be more malleable. Follow-up studies are being carried out on these children, who are now in their twenties and thirties, and there is no sign of autism.
Isn't that untrue? I read that it has never been proven that the method actually works as it says. And I also read somewhere that with a lot of these kids the autism 'comes back' when they are older.
47% success? That sounds like failure to me! Well, I'm glad this bloke didn't get anywhere near my kids - so far 60% are now in their twenties and 100% of them are leading perfectly happy lives, thank you. 'Normal'? What the heck is a 'normal life'?
One hundred percent of me is having a great life, too - and I had no part in this programme either. 
I'm alittle bit offended by the mispelling cuz "Ivar" is my name too.
However, what the goals of the intervention is, how the intervention is done and whether it is time well spent can and should be criticized - in my opinion, but I don't really know much about IBI and ABA in practice.
The children started the programme aged 3-4 years when the brain is said to be more malleable. Follow-up studies are being carried out on these children, who are now in their twenties and thirties, and there is no sign of autism.
Isn't that untrue? I read that it has never been proven that the method actually works as it says. And I also read somewhere that with a lot of these kids the autism 'comes back' when they are older.
47% success? That sounds like failure to me! Well, I'm glad this bloke didn't get anywhere near my kids - so far 60% are now in their twenties and 100% of them are leading perfectly happy lives, thank you. 'Normal'? What the heck is a 'normal life'?
One hundred percent of me is having a great life, too - and I had no part in this programme either. 
"normal" is a a false sense of security for the intellectually lacking or extremely boring.
So basically they're saying, torture my child normal. These kind of people don't deserve children.