08-07-2007, 09:21 PM
With respect to the fast paced talking part, and our slower, more intensive, deliberate manner of calculating a social response, DEFINITELY, said my last therapist Janice Grose LCSW (she said it not me, reference the appropriate source here).
And that probably helps explain the preferential pairing of most Aspergians and cousins versus the preferential pairings of most NTs.
Still, I haven't completely figured out the fact that I have a car and so far my gfs have not. I reckon it sorta sucks hanging around the flat or the group house even if there is a check coming in, you don't go far or fast on foot, it's more fun with a guy with a car?
I wonder if the geographic distances and the availability of mass transit make a difference.
gf 1 80 miles no mass transit
gf 2 10 miles mass transit exists
gf 3 21 miles there is a mass transit, she says they are not regular
All three seem to be relatively near places where it would be fun to spend some time with a guy, for example, Potomac Mills 30 miles south of Washington.
I wonder if there is a social expectation that a woman has to go out with somebody "doing better" (marrying up? or social status)
I know my brother in 1998 was fired on by his gf's gf (note a girlfriend of a girl is generally a platonic term in US slang) who insisted she get somebody with greater status (my brother had as much time in his first job as I do now in mine at the time, so money was not a concern)
Perhaps it is very difficult for an Aspergian or a cousin, male or female, to attain the occupational and financial level required to sign a lease, pay for a car's insurance and maintenance (also registration and local taxes and gas), and so on, even if she has or almost has an education (gf 1 was pursuing an undergraduate degree in special ed)
Perhaps I lose sight of how difficult it is because I did make the full financial equivalent of my NT peers, minus a mortgage which is probably wise given the subprime market meltdown. Mortgage payments easily exceeded my rent by $400 a month. I am well aware that the tax deduction on mortgage interest does not last forever.
So, maybe the fact that I don't attract women on my standard of living is because, then
1. Women who do are usually NTs; NTs would not prefer to slow down to our processing level.
2. A/C women rarely if ever reach the NT standard of living. I think I meet one last year, Homeland Security employee, homeowner. But we are too polite in the disability dating group to inquire about disabilities that are not readily apparent, so who knows? (What she did say was that she had no religious affiliation. )
As a believer born again and saved, I want Jesus Christ to claim a secondary victory in my life, an earthly love.
Interfaith exogamy would be forfeiting my participation in the endeavor and conceding defeat in the Name of Jesus Christ. That's it, pick up your chips and leave the poker table, marriage is for life, and Jesus presumably didn't give a damn.
One might ask, why wouldn't Jesus send a Christian a non-believer?
The same Jesus that told the Apostle Paul that it was a mistake to be unequally yoked with nonbelievers (like the Superman II movie where Superman gives up his Kryptonian powers for Lois Lane, only to discover three villians from before he was born discovered Earth)
I don't want a mega bitter taste in my Christian mouth. The other rationales such as how to raise the kids, a magnetic personality throwing off your spiritual compass, etc. seem tame by comparison.
And that probably helps explain the preferential pairing of most Aspergians and cousins versus the preferential pairings of most NTs.
Still, I haven't completely figured out the fact that I have a car and so far my gfs have not. I reckon it sorta sucks hanging around the flat or the group house even if there is a check coming in, you don't go far or fast on foot, it's more fun with a guy with a car?
I wonder if the geographic distances and the availability of mass transit make a difference.
gf 1 80 miles no mass transit
gf 2 10 miles mass transit exists
gf 3 21 miles there is a mass transit, she says they are not regular
All three seem to be relatively near places where it would be fun to spend some time with a guy, for example, Potomac Mills 30 miles south of Washington.
I wonder if there is a social expectation that a woman has to go out with somebody "doing better" (marrying up? or social status)
I know my brother in 1998 was fired on by his gf's gf (note a girlfriend of a girl is generally a platonic term in US slang) who insisted she get somebody with greater status (my brother had as much time in his first job as I do now in mine at the time, so money was not a concern)
Perhaps it is very difficult for an Aspergian or a cousin, male or female, to attain the occupational and financial level required to sign a lease, pay for a car's insurance and maintenance (also registration and local taxes and gas), and so on, even if she has or almost has an education (gf 1 was pursuing an undergraduate degree in special ed)
Perhaps I lose sight of how difficult it is because I did make the full financial equivalent of my NT peers, minus a mortgage which is probably wise given the subprime market meltdown. Mortgage payments easily exceeded my rent by $400 a month. I am well aware that the tax deduction on mortgage interest does not last forever.
So, maybe the fact that I don't attract women on my standard of living is because, then
1. Women who do are usually NTs; NTs would not prefer to slow down to our processing level.
2. A/C women rarely if ever reach the NT standard of living. I think I meet one last year, Homeland Security employee, homeowner. But we are too polite in the disability dating group to inquire about disabilities that are not readily apparent, so who knows? (What she did say was that she had no religious affiliation. )
As a believer born again and saved, I want Jesus Christ to claim a secondary victory in my life, an earthly love.
Interfaith exogamy would be forfeiting my participation in the endeavor and conceding defeat in the Name of Jesus Christ. That's it, pick up your chips and leave the poker table, marriage is for life, and Jesus presumably didn't give a damn.
One might ask, why wouldn't Jesus send a Christian a non-believer?
The same Jesus that told the Apostle Paul that it was a mistake to be unequally yoked with nonbelievers (like the Superman II movie where Superman gives up his Kryptonian powers for Lois Lane, only to discover three villians from before he was born discovered Earth)
I don't want a mega bitter taste in my Christian mouth. The other rationales such as how to raise the kids, a magnetic personality throwing off your spiritual compass, etc. seem tame by comparison.